The extent and cost of Harvey’s destruction were significant. But when balanced against the anticipated increase in business activity due to reconstruction…
Editors Note: This is part II of a IV part series.
Economic Impact
The extent and cost of Harvey’s destruction were significant. But when balanced against the anticipated increase in business activity due to reconstruction and restoration efforts, combined with an influx of funding from federal aid and insurance payments, the effect on the state’s economy may be much less severe than many expected.
Gains from increased construction activity and associated spending undertaken to repair and rebuild should help offset losses in the months and years to come.
During and immediately following the storm, Texas communities in the affected areas faced costs associated with emergency response, evacuee shelters, debris removal and infrastructure repair.
Many suffered damage to public buildings and vehicles that must be repaired or replaced. Many businesses, in addition to repairing damaged facilities, must replace some or all of their equipment and inventory.
Meanwhile, thousands of evacuees staying in hotels or rental units faced temporary housing costs and, upon returning to their flood-damaged homes, began replacing floors and sheetrock and purchasing furniture, household goods, electronics, clothes and vehicles.
Direct and Indirect Damages
Weather events such as Harvey cause both direct and indirect damages. Direct damages include the destruction of buildings, possessions, vehicles and infrastructure, such as roads, water systems and power lines.
Indirect damages refer to the interruption of business activity caused by the storm — disruptions caused by safety concerns, the loss of electrical power, damaged machinery or the temporary inability of employees to reach work. These affect the economy through lost business income as well as reduced employee earnings or, in some cases, lost jobs.17
While direct damages represent the most obvious and visible effects of the hurricane, they do not enter into our analysis because they represent what economists call retrospective or “sunk” costs — in essence, money already spent, economic activity that has already taken place.
A home, for instance, affects economic output when it is built, but not if it is damaged or destroyed a decade later by a storm. Its repair or rebuilding, however, will affect the economy.
Harvey disrupted a broad range of industries, but manufacturers represented a large share of them.18 Although many were back in operation within five or so days, some experienced significant disruptions for two weeks or more.19
Based on information submitted to the Comptroller’s office, federal, state and local governments, along with private insurers, had spent or committed about $31 billion for Harvey-related disaster relief and rebuilding as of Nov. 30, 2017.
This number is likely to rise. Money for reconstruction efforts will come primarily from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), state and local governments and private insurance (Exhibit 2).
EXHIBIT 2: FUNDING SOURCES FOR HURRICANE DISASTER RELIEF
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Small Business Administration
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development – Community Development Block Grants
State and Local Funds
Private Insurance Companies
Nonprofit Organizations
Sources: Congressional Research Service and the Texas Legislative Budget Board
All of this spending will spur economic growth
Without the boost from rebuilding, Texas’ gross state product (GSP) would have required four years to recover to pre-Harvey expectations; personal income would require five years.
Single-family residential housing stock would take seven years to rebound to normally expected levels, while non-residential building stock in the affected areas would require four years for recovery.20
With the help of federal, state and local government aid, however, all of these measures should recover in the second year after the storm, and Texas should gain about half as many jobs as it would have lost in the absence of government aid.
Exhibit 3 displays the estimated indirect losses and gains to Texas GSP resulting from Hurricane Harvey. In all, the total estimated net impact (losses plus gains) is a $3.8 billion loss in GSP in the first year following the storm. (To put this loss in perspective, Texas’ GSP was $1.6 trillion in 2016.)21
Recovery will stimulate economic activity, producing an estimated $800 million cumulative gain in GSP over three years.22
EXHIBIT 3: NET ECONOMIC IMPACT OF HURRICANE HARVEY ON TEXAS GROSS STATE PRODUCT (in billions of dollars)
| Impact | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Years 1-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated Losses | ($16.8) | ($2.0) | ($1.0) | ($19.8) |
| Estimated Gains | $13.0 | $4.1 | $3.5 | $20.6 |
| Net Economic Impact | ($3.8) | $2.1 | $2.5 | $0.8 |
Source: Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts
It’s also possible to assess economic costs on a local basis by examining the counties included in Texas’ councils of government (COGs), multi-county regional planning bodies. Harvey affected eight COG regions — the Houston-Galveston, South East Texas, Golden Crescent, Coastal Bend, Brazos Valley, Deep East Texas, Capital and Alamo areas — and 41 counties within them were designated as disaster areas (Exhibit 4).
The storm hit the 13-county Houston-Galveston COG region hardest, causing an estimated $16 billion economic loss during the first year. FEMA designated all 13 counties in this region as disaster areas.
The Coastal Bend, South East Texas and Golden Crescent COGs can expect first-year losses projected at $350 million to $800 million each.
The Alamo Area, Capital Area and North Central Texas regions, by contrast, stand to gain in Harvey’s wake, each with an estimated $1 billion to $2 billion in additional economic activity.
The methodology used to estimate losses and gains in economic activity as a result of Harvey relied on a combination of data, assumptions and estimates. REMI calculates the effect of losses and gains on projected GSP for the duration of the time period used in this analysis. (Appendix 2 provides a detailed description of the methodology used in this analysis.)
Several factors influenced the inputs used to generate this estimate, including the number and population of counties affected by Hurricane Harvey as well as the extent and duration of the damage.
Because the affected areas do not match up neatly with COG boundary lines, this estimate assumes only the affected counties experienced productivity loss and reduces nonfarm productivity by the proportion of people in affected counties to the total population of each region.
Our estimate also addresses reconstruction and repairs in the first three years, although no actual timeline for reconstruction has been determined.
The estimate also assumes the duration of business closures or reduced revenue as follows:
Recovery and Beyond
Despite the transitory nature of Harvey’s impact on employment and business activity, the damage to property and infrastructure has been severe.
Moreover, insured losses are expected to be a smaller share of the total damages compared with other major U.S. hurricanes because a larger-than-usual share of the property damage was caused by flooding rather than wind damage, and flooding generally is not covered under homeowner policies.
The negative economic impact of lost productivity and damage to structures, however, is expected to be counterbalanced largely by businesses’ quick recovery as well as the money communities and businesses spend to rebuild.
Texas’ diverse and resilient economy will help buoy the state from Harvey’s impact. While some industries continue to struggle, most businesses are recovering and moving ahead.
In all, our analysis indicates that Hurricane Harvey will have minimal long-term effects on the Texas economy, which — with time — will recover and be stronger than ever.
Hurricane Harvey and the State Budget
The damages wrought by Harvey will affect the state budget as well. While the federal government, local authorities and private insurance are providing much of the funding needed for cleanup and rebuilding, the state may have further expenses.
Determining funding sources and storm-related expenses is an ongoing task, and the picture is changing rapidly as information is shared among state, federal and local entities.
The Comptroller, Legislative Budget Board and the Governor’s office are working together to identify and track Harvey-related revenues and expenditures.
Harvey and Texas Task Force 1
Amid the chaos of Hurricane Harvey, Texas Task Force 1 (TX-TF1) deployed to Texas coastal communities to coordinate and perform search and rescue missions.
More than 250 TX-TF1 personnel participated, as did teams from Texas state agencies, two federal agencies and more than a dozen other states.
In all, the effort completed 841 rescues by air, 19,050 rescues by ground or water and nearly 38,000 evacuations.
TX-TF1, comprising more than 600 volunteers representing 60 organizations throughout Texas, is one of 28 federal teams within FEMA’s National Search and Rescue System. TX-TF1 is based in College Station and sponsored by the Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service (TEEX).
Under the direction of the Texas Department of Public Safety’s Texas Division of Emergency Management, TX-TF1 also serves as a statewide urban search and rescue team. In partnership with the Texas Military Department (TMD), the task force coordinates the state’s swift-water rescue program and helicopter search and rescue team.
TX-TF1 maintains its readiness for rapid response through training classes and exercises held throughout the year at a 52-acre training facility in College Station called Disaster City, a mock community outfitted with full-scale, collapsible structures that simulate disaster and wreckage.
“Texas A&M System and TEEX support includes Disaster City, originally built to train TX-TF1, a 40,000-square-foot headquarters facility, a large vehicle fleet and equipment cache and 18 TEEX staff to provide constant and well-trained support of the team and its equipment,” says Chuck Jones, TX-TF1 operations chief.
“Our mission is to always be ready to respond at a moment’s notice, to do the most good for the most people in the least amount of time,” says Jeff Saunders, TX-TF1 director. “The support the Texas A&M University System and TEEX give to TX-TF1 is incredible, and a critical part of what keeps this team always ready to respond.”
TX-TF1 members include firefighters, doctors, nurses, structural engineers, canine handlers, professors, police officers and other professionals from many different fields. TX-TF1 also has 10 trained and FEMA-certified dogs for locating survivors and human remains.
TX-TF1 has been deployed more than 100 times in its 20-year history, assisting with a wide range of emergency and disaster recovery operations around the state and across the nation.
From the team’s first deployment in response to the 1997 tornado in Jarrell, Texas, to 2017’s Hurricane Harvey, TX-TF1 has provided on-site emergency services under the most severe and challenging circumstances.
Read A Storm To Remember Part 1: Hurricane Harvey And The Texas Economy – Introduction
This article and the photos were originally published by the State of Texas Comptroller.
The San Marcos City Council received a presentation on the Sidewalk Maintenance and Gap Infill…
The San Marcos River Rollers have skated through obstacles after taking a two-year break during…
San Marcos Corridor News has been reporting on the incredible communities in the Hays County…
Visitors won't be able to swim in the crystal clear waters of the Jacobs Well Natural…
Looking to adopt or foster animals from the local shelter? Here are the San Marcos…
The Lone Star State leads the nation in labor-related accidents and especially workplace deaths and…
This website uses cookies.