Fifth Circuit Court Forces U.S. Fish & Wildlife To Reconsider Golden-Cheeked Warbler As Endangered Species

Terra Rivers, Managing editor

The Fifth Circuit Court released an opinion in Texas General Land Office vs. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. According to the opinion, the court found the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had denied a position to delist the Golden-Cheek Warbler based on an incorrect legal standard.

The court’s opinion states “whether a species is endangered or threatened is determined solely on the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available.”

“[The Court’s] unanimous decision by the Fifth Circuit panel is a big win for private property rights in Texas,” said Robert Henneke, general counsel at the Texas Public Policy Foundation. “The most recent, credible science demonstrates that the golden-cheeked warbler has recovered and should no longer be regulated under the Endangered Species Act.”

Henneke said a 2015 study of the species by the Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute showed the warbler is 19 times greater in population and has 5 times as much habitat as when it was first listed on the endangered-species list.

The Texas Public Policy Foundation filed the lawsuit in June 2017 on behalf of the Texas General Land Office regarding the issue.

“Leaving a species on the endangered list after its recovery is not only ineffective, it’s irresponsible,” said Texas Land Commissioner George P. Bush when the lawsuit was filed. “The restoration of the golden-cheeked warbler population is a success story worth celebrating by removing it from the endangered list and restoring the rights of Texas landowners to effectively manage our own properties.”

Amicus briefs in support of the lawsuit were filed by Texas Senator Donna Campbell, American Stewards for Liberty and the Texas Attorney General.

The petition has been sent back to Fish and Wildlife Service for reconsideration under the correct legal standard.

Read the full opinion here.

View Comments

  • This science is based on a piss poor methodology and runs counter to ALL of the other studies conducted. The study cited mentions "potential"habitat, not the actual number of birds. What a crock.

Share
Published by
Staff

Recent Posts

San Marcos City Council reviews Sidewalk Maintenance and Gap Infill Program

The San Marcos City Council received a presentation on the Sidewalk Maintenance and Gap Infill…

2 years ago

San Marcos River Rollers skate on and rebuild

The San Marcos River Rollers have skated through obstacles after taking a two-year break during…

2 years ago

After 8 Years, San Marcos Corridor News Bids Our Readers Farewell

San Marcos Corridor News has been reporting on the incredible communities in the Hays County…

2 years ago

High bacteria levels at Jacobs Well halts swimming season

Visitors won't be able to swim in the crystal clear waters of the Jacobs Well Natural…

2 years ago

Pets of the Week: Meet Sally & Nutella!

Looking to adopt or foster animals from the local shelter? Here are the San Marcos…

2 years ago

Texas still leads in workplace deaths among Hispanics

The Lone Star State leads the nation in labor-related accidents and especially workplace deaths and…

2 years ago

This website uses cookies.