What’s Keeping Nominal Wages Down?

For the past year, the U.S. labor market has moved toward full employment. This hasn’t spurred rapid nominal wage growth. The reason is low inflation and…

By Dr. Luis Torres

For the past year, the U.S. labor market has moved toward full employment. This hasn’t spurred rapid nominal wage growth (Figure 1).

The reason is low inflation and dismal productivity growth.

 

Nominal wages are real wages plus inflation. Nominal wage is measured in dollars, while real wage is measured in purchasing power.

 

Workers care about the real wage because it measures actual purchasing power of goods and services. Firms also care about the real wage because it captures the cost of hiring labor and is determined by productivity.

 

Why is measuring real wages important?

 

Let’s say that nominal wages and overall inflation both go up by 5 percent. That means there is no change in the amount of goods and services you can purchase.

 

In other words, you’re no better or worse off. But if overall inflation would have risen by 7 percent, you would be worse off because you could purchase fewer goods and services.

 

In other words, “inflation ate your raise.”

 

The phrase “inflation ate your raise” was common during the ’70s when inflation was high and obstinate. That’s why nominal wages rose at a higher rate during that time.

 

Inflation has systematically trended down since then, accompanied by a decline in nominal wages (Figure 2).

 

Don’t expect a big increase in nominal wages when inflation is currently below 2 percent.

So how about real wages? 

 

Real wage growth peaked during the late ’90s, boosted by the surge in productivity. It has since fallen as productivity has declined.

 

Real wages are still increasing (meaning real purchasing power is increasing) but at a lower rate than in the ’90s.

 

 

Going forward, if productivity does not increase at a higher rate, neither will real wages. This will cause nominal wages to grow basically at the current rate if inflation continues to be low.

 

Higher productivity means higher real wages, which translates into an increase in purchasing power.


zzz

 

Dr. Luis Torres is a Research Economist at the Real Estate Center Texas A&M University.

This article was originally published by Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University.

 

The Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University conducts research on financial, socioeconomic, public policy, trade, legal, land use and local market analysis issues related to real estate. The Center is the nation’s largest publicly funded organization devoted to real estate research. Find more information about the Center at https://www.recenter.tamu.edu/about-us/about-center/.

zzz

 

 

 

 


 

Share
Published by
Staff

Recent Posts

San Marcos City Council reviews Sidewalk Maintenance and Gap Infill Program

The San Marcos City Council received a presentation on the Sidewalk Maintenance and Gap Infill…

2 years ago

San Marcos River Rollers skate on and rebuild

The San Marcos River Rollers have skated through obstacles after taking a two-year break during…

2 years ago

After 8 Years, San Marcos Corridor News Bids Our Readers Farewell

San Marcos Corridor News has been reporting on the incredible communities in the Hays County…

2 years ago

High bacteria levels at Jacobs Well halts swimming season

Visitors won't be able to swim in the crystal clear waters of the Jacobs Well Natural…

2 years ago

Pets of the Week: Meet Sally & Nutella!

Looking to adopt or foster animals from the local shelter? Here are the San Marcos…

2 years ago

Texas still leads in workplace deaths among Hispanics

The Lone Star State leads the nation in labor-related accidents and especially workplace deaths and…

2 years ago

This website uses cookies.