Council To Consider Cite & Release Ordinance On Final Reading

Staff Reports

The San Marcos City Council will consider the ordinance establishing a mandatory cite and release program on the final reading Tuesday night.

The council approved the ordinance on the first of two readings on April 7 with three amendments to the language inside the ordinance, which can be found in Sections 2 and 5 (ordinance can be viewed below.).

According to the agenda, the Criminal Justice Reform subcommittee has been studying criminal justice reform efforts “in parallel” to what is being done on the county level since it was formed in May 2019.

The ordinance will require officers to cite and release whenever possible for the following offenses, in accordance with article 14.06 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure:

  1. Class C misdemeanors other than public intoxication, assault, or family violence.
  2. Possession of Marijuana less than 4 oz, Class A or Class B misdemeanor
  3. Driving while License Invalid, Class B misdemeanor
  4. Criminal Mischief, Class B misdemeanor
  5. Graffiti, Class A or Class B misdemeanor
  6. Theft of Property, Class B misdemeanor
  7. Theft of Services, Class B misdemeanor

During the first reading, the council approved an amendment to remove the word “only” from the second paragraph of Section 2, which provides six circumstances in which an officer may find it necessary to arrest an individual instead of citing them.

The full amended paragraph is as follows:

The City Council further recognizes that the use of the cite and release process may not be appropriate in all instances, and that SMPD officers may find it necessary to arrest a person suspected of having committed any of the above-listed offenses only if any of the following circumstances are present…

The amendment was proposed twice during the meeting: once by Mayor Jane Hughson and once by Councilmember Melissa Derrick.

It passed on the second motion 4-3 with Councilmembers Mark Rockeymoore, Jocabed Marquez, and Maxfield Baker voting against.

The San Marcos community remains divided on whether the program should be implemented as an ordinance or not.

Numerous members of the community have expressed their support for a cite and release ordinance, hoping to reduce the jail population and protect the community’s low-income residents from the financial strains that can be caused by an arrest.

“I worked at the university for twenty years, where I saw lives absolutely ruined,” Derrick said during council’s March 3 discussion. “I worked in multi-cultural affairs across from the Dean of Students and watched many students, after being arrested for small amounts of marijuana, have nowhere to go after that. There’s no college; there are no scholarships. There are no job opportunities.”

The ordinance will require officers to cite and release offenders of the seven eligible offenses unless the offenders are ineligible under the Texas Code or the officers’ discretion deems the circumstances warrant an arrest.

While a majority of the council supports the ordinance, some members of the community have expressed concerns about the ordinance’s language and the potential unintended consequences, such as the loss of officers’ discretion.

Among those who are opposed to the ordinance are the San Marcos Police Association, the San Marcos Police Department and Hays County District Attorney Wes Mau.

Ordinance 2020-18, regarding Cite and Release, is listed as item number 3 on the City Council’s consent agenda, which means it may be passed without further discussion in open court.

Mano Amiga, a local activist group and supporter of the ordinance, issued a statement Sunday requesting the council postpone the item due to Saturday night’s tragedy

“Mano Amiga joins the entire San Marcos community to convey our condolences for the senseless violence that transpired last night, and the considerable harm and pain it has caused the families of those impacted, including Officer Justin Putnam, whose life was unfairly taken in the line of duty,” Mano Amiga said. “While we may not see eye to eye with San Marcos Police Department leadership on every policy issue, we do recognize the space they deserve to grieve and heal in the wake of this tragic event.” 

Former Mayor John Thomaides of San Marcos has also posted on social media asking the council to postpone the item. 

The San Marcos City Council will convene at 6 PM for a virtual meeting via Zoom, which will be streamed online and on TV (Grande Channel 16 or Spectrum Channel 10).

Written comments for a City Council meeting must be sent to citizencomment@sanmarcostx.gov no later than noon on the day of the meeting.

Written comments will be read during the public comment period by city staff.

Page 1 / 4
Zoom 100%
ORDINANCE NO. 2020
-_____
AN ORDINANCE SUPPORTING THE SAN MARCOS POLICE
DEPARTMENT’S
INCREASED
USE OF THE CITE AND RELEASE
PROCESS
, WHEN APPROPRIATE, INSTEAD OF ARRESTING
INDIVIDUALS SUSPECTED OF HAVING COMMITTED
CERTAIN MISDEMEANOR OFFENSES
; R
EQUIRING RECORD
KEEPING AND REPORTING OF USE OF THE CITE AND
RELEASE PROCESS AND INSTANCES IN WHICH INDIVIDUALS
HAVE BEEN ARRESTED FOR CITE AND RELEASE ELIGIBLE
OFFENSES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
RECITALS:
1.
State law allows use of citation in lie
u of arrest for certain m
isdemeanor
offenses.
2.
In 2018, the San Marcos Police Department (SMPD) made arrests for
citation
-eligible offenses, which translates to lost hours of officer time.
3.
Data provided by SMPD shows that in 2018, misdemeanor possession of
marijuana under 2 oz and driving while license invalid accounted for more than half of
arrests for citation
-eligible offenses.
4.
The City Council acknowledges that our Peace Officers are allowed to
exercise their discretion to issue a citation in lieu of
arresting individuals for certain
offenses when authorized by State law under article 14.08 of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure.
5.
The City Council supports SMPD’s commitment to increase the use of the
cite and release process as part of a combined strategy, in cooperation with the Hays County
Criminal District Attorney’s Office, to divert eligible individuals from being incarcerated,
prosecuted, and convicted in the criminal justice system.
6.
The City Council deems it necessary to have SMPD gather, r
eport, and
publish statistical information to demonstrate trends in the department’s use of the cite and
release process, including the frequency of use, offense type, justification for arrest (when
an arrest is made), and the age, race, and ethnicity of i
ndividuals who were arrested and
jailed instead of receiving citations and being released for the same offense.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
MARCOS:
SECTION
1.
The City Council supports the SMPD’s increased use of the cite
and release process, rather than arrest,
in appropriate circumstances,
for individuals
suspected of committing the following offenses
, in accordance with article 14.06 of the
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure:
1.
Class C misdemeanors other than public intox
ication,
assault
, or family
violence.
2.
Possession of Marijuana less than 4 oz, Class A or Class B misdemeanor
3.
Driving while License Invalid, Class B misdemeanor
4.
Criminal Mischief, Class B misdemeanor
5.
Graffiti, Class A or Class B misdemeanor
6.
Theft of Property, Class B misdemeanor
7.
Theft of Services, Class B misdemeanor
SECTION
2.
The City Council recognizes that use of the cite and release process
may not be appropriate in all circumstances and that SMPD officers may exercise their
discretion to issue a written or verbal warning in lieu of issuing a citation or making an
arrest for a person suspected of committing any offense listed in Section 1.
The City Council
further recognizes
that the use of the cite and release process may not be
appropriate in all instances, and that SMPD officers may find it necessary to arrest a person
suspected of having committed any of the above
-listed offenses
only
if any of the following
circumstances are present:
1.
The subject does not provide satisfactory evidence of personal
identification to allow for citation.
2.
The subject is not a resident of the county in which the offense was
allegedly committed. For the purposes of this Section, an indivi
dual
who lives, works, or goes to school in the county where the offense
was allegedly committed will be deemed to be a resident of
Hays
County
. In determining whether the subject is able to provide
satisfactory evidence of personal identification
, it shall be
acknowledged that not all persons are able to produce a government
-
issued ID. Therefore, although a government
-issued ID is preferred,
the City shall accept other forms of identification, regardless of
expiration date, including but not limi
ted to: any state or federally
-
issued ID, utility or rent bill, student ID, or other forms of
identification that include an individual’s name and address, as well
as photos of the aforementioned forms of identification.
3.
There is reason to believe The
arresting officer believes
that the safety
of persons (including the subject) would be imminently endangered by
the release of the subject. In making this assessment, it shall be
considered
the arresting officer shall consider
whether the subject has
the
physical or mental capacity to endanger the safety of themselves or
the public, whether the subject is unlawfully carrying a weapon, and/or
if the subject has made immediate threats against other individuals in
the area. In cases in which the subject appears to suffer from mental
illness and/or addiction, a referral to appropriate medical and/or
psychiatric services in lieu of arrest
shall be considered in accordance
with SMPD policy.
4.
The subject demands to be taken before a magistrate.
5.
The subject h
as an outstanding arrest warrant from a criminal law
enforcement agency.
6.
The subject is also suspected of having committed an offense for which
the cite and release process is not allowed by state law.
SECTION
3.
In any case where an arrest is made for the above
-listed offenses,
the specific reasons for making the arrest instead of issuing a citation shall be included in
the incident report. No arresting officer described in this section shall be charged with any
criminal offense for non-
compliance w
ith this ordinance.
SECTION
4.
The City Manager shall provide and make available to the public
a quarterly report or memorandum concerning the use of the cite and release process in lieu
of arrest in instances when a ticket or citation is allowed by state law. This report or
memorandum shall be provided to the City Council and made public on a quarterly basis
and should document anonymized records of every instance that a resident was issued a
citation in lieu of arrest and every instance t
hat a resident was arrested for a nonviolent
misdemeanor charge when the suspect had no outstanding warrants, was not intoxicated
and legally could have been given a citation, but an arrest was made anyway, and shall
include the justifications for the arre
sts. The memorandum shall also include the following
data for each instance:
1.
The reason for the stop;
2.
The particular offense alleged;
3.
The age, race, and ethnicity of the person arrested;
4.
The location where the incident occurred.
5.
The reason for the arrest.
Information regarding specific arrests shall be organized according to race and ethnicity
in order to allow racial disparities to be easily analyzed. This report or memorandum
should not include information that would jeopardize any
ongoing criminal
investigation or prosecution, and the report should include the number of unduplicated
officers making such discretionary arrests.
SECTION 5.
The City Council directs the City Manager to work with the San
Marcos Police Chief and
other
relevant
stakeholders mentioned below to update all
relevant City policies and internal operating procedures in accordance with this Ordinance.
Actions that may be necessary include, but are not limited to: updating the San Marcos
Police Department General Manual, updating the training bulletin and training officers on
the new guidelines for citation versus arrest, and updating the internal databases and
systems to remove any guidelines under the manua
l that are no longer in effect due to this
Ordinance.
The City Council directs the City Manager to arrange regular meetings of the Police Chief’s
Advisory Panel, other interested stakeholders and community organizations, individuals
directly
impacted by the policing and arrests of immigrant communities and communities
of color, and any representatives that may be designated by the Hays County District
Attorney’s Office in the development of policies, procedures, and practices related to this
Ordinance. These meetings shall be open to public participation
by including a citizen
comment agenda item.
SECTION 6.
A
progress
update shall be provided to City Council within three
months after adoption of this ordinance. A written update shall be provided to the City
Council within six months after the adoption of this ordinance
which includes information
regarding all updates t
o policies, procedures, and practices identified and implemented, as
a result of this ordinance.
SECTION 7
.
This ordinance shall become effective upon approval on second
reading.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING
on A
pril 7, 2020.
PASSED, APPROVED
AND ADOPTED
on April 21, 2020.
Jane Hughson
Mayor
Attest:
Approved:
Tammy K. Cook
Michael J. Cosentino
Interim City Clerk
City Attorney
Page 1 / 4
Zoom 100%

 

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button