Crime rates in San Marcos increasing

Kevin Baxter | Staff Reporter

SAN MARCOS – San Marcos’ crime rate has nearly doubled over the past ten years. For its class, San Marcos has recently risen over the national average for violent crime.

Though the crime rates in San Marcos have increased, the funding for law enforcement and similar services has not grown. Recently, the San Marcos Police Department Chief of Police, Stan Standridge, made a presentation to city council about budget and staffing concerns along with the rising crime rates in the city.

According to the presentation, violent crime has risen by 90.1% over the last ten years.

“The City’s 2019 Part 1 Uniform Crime Reports were higher than Seguin, Kyle, College Station, Georgetown, Hays County, and even New Braunfels,” according to the presentation.

In 2018, the violent crime rate was even slightly higher than Austin’s violent crime rate.

“Prior to this upward trend, San Marcos’ violent crime fared better than nearly all of these cities,” the presentation states.

Mental health calls have also dramatically risen over the past five years. In 2015, there were 784 mental health-related calls. This has risen to 1,739 mental health-related calls in 2020. These two numbers, given by the SMPD Chief of Police, indicate a 122% increase over the past five years.

According to the presentation, there has not been much of an increase in officers or 911 Operators over the last decade. At this same time, the population of San Marcos has grown by 43.5%.

“City Council has not authorized any increases in sworn staffing since 2018,” the presentation says. “No sworn supervisors have been added since 2016, when one sergeant was added. The department actually lost one Commander position and has operated with only four commanders since 2002.”

At this time, one commander is unsustainably supervising all evenings and midnights seven days a week. There are also only around six officers patrolling the streets for the entirety of San Marcos.

“They are staffed with eight officers, but one is allowed to take vacation, and one is allowed to attend training. Dayshift minimum staffing on the streets is six, as are evenings and midnights,” the presentation states.

The presentation shows that the Criminal Investigations Division is one of the more pressing concerns for staffing.

“Until 2021, the Criminal Investigations Division has not added a detective in 10 years,” stated the slide. “Due to the types of offenses the City is experiencing (which are above the national average), the inherent complications that come with violent crimes and the ever-present need to collect more and more evidence including technological evidence, the demand on CID is unmanageable for the number of detectives currently employed.”

Every day cases are inactivated because of the lack of staffing. Not having enough investigators to keep up with the amount of violent crime in the city could bring many concerns to those living in San Marcos.

As the population has continued to rise, there has been no increase in 911 operators since 2013. San Marcos 911 communications division is currently short-staffed by 11 positions, or by 41%.

San Marcos’ 911 communications division is also the only division in the county that deals with Emergency Medical Dispatch, Emergency Fire Dispatch, and Emergency Police Dispatch.

“Additionally the Division handles all Fire and EMS calls for the University, while also handling a portion of EMS calls for Guadalupe County,” the presentation says.

Pay is another issue for the 911 communications division. According to the presentation, “They are not the highest-paid telecommunicators in the Government Building, and they have no certificate pay or shift differential pay. With certificate pay and base pay combined, the City of Kyle and Hays County pay more for these positions.”

The rising crime rate and public safety has also been a hot issue with some of the candidates running for  the San Marcos City Council.

Recently during a City Council Candidate Forum hosted by the Four Rivers Association of Realtors and the San Marcos Area Chamber of Commerce, city council candidate for place 5 Mark Gleason said that providing support to first responders is one of his top priorities.

“We’re going to have to continue to have those discussions about what the fire department and what the police department and EMS needs,” said Gleason. “And what 911 operators need. We are short eleven 911 operators as of today, and that is a dangerous situation in our community.”

According to myneighborhoodupdate.com, the sharpest increase in calls to SMPD in the past 12 months is classified under “other.” Which consists of mental health calls including welfare checks or suicides.

According to Neighborhood scout, San Marcos is only in the 15th percentile for city safety in the country. That being so, the city is below the national average in violent crime per 1,000, while the state of Texas is above the national average.

There are slightly less than 4 instances of violent crime per 1,000 residents in San Marcos while in Texas, as a whole, the number is around 4.2. That beats the national median of 4 per 1,000 residents. Around 1 in every 254 citizens are expected to be victims of violent crime in San Marcos.

Property crime, on the other hand, is different. While San Marcos is still below the national average in violent crime, property crime is much higher.

There are around 26 instances of property crime in San Marcos Per 1,000 people, surpassing the state of Texas which is around 24. The National median for property crime is 21 instances per 1,000 residents. About one in every 25 San Marcos citizens are expected to be victims of property crime.

Jude Prather, running for city council place 6 in the November 2 election, also voiced concerns about public safety at the candidate forum.

“The situation with public safety is very concerning,” said Prather. “San Marcos, we’ve had five officers killed or wounded in the past three years.”

According to the Texas DPS, San Marcos did see a slight drop in the total amount of crime reported by about 4.1%, from 2019 to 2020.

The specific types of crimes that dropped were Larceny and murder. The reported larceny had dropped from 1,177 in 2019 to 1,017 in 2020. Murders dropped from 8 in 2019 to just 2 in 2020.

Apart from Larceny and murder,  all other crimes saw a slight rise in 2020, giving San Marcos a total crime rate of 1,699 in 2020.

“We have had a 90% increase in violent crime in our community in the last ten years,” said Gleason. “That is real, and that’s serious. On average, they’re dealing with 3,200 traffic accidents in our community every year.”

Page 1 / 3
Zoom 100%
1
AUGUST 6
San Marcos Police Department
Chief Stan Standridge
POLICE
DEPARTMENT
BUDGET
CONSIDERATIONS
FY
20
22
2
BUDGET
CONSIDERATIONS
FY 2022
This document may help frame budget conversations related to the
upcoming
budget
process
.
It is being sent at the request of the City Manager
for City Council consideration
.
The Police Department has significant needs which warran
t immediate attention.
Increasing Workload:
Violent crime has increased 90.1% in only ten years
(2010 to 2020)
.
The
City of
San Marcos violent crime rate
has been
above the national average
for its class
for the past two years.
The City’s
2019 Part 1
UCR crimes were higher than
Seguin, Kyle, College Station, Georgetown, Hays County and even New Braunfels.
In 2018, for example, the violent crime index per 1,000 citizens in San Marcos
was HIGHER than the City of Austin (3.97 vs 3.82).
Prior to this u
pward trend,
San Marcos
’ violent crime
fared better than nearly all of these cities.
The Department responds to more than 3,000 traffic crashes annually
.
The Traffic
Division has not been staffed for years so
there are no Traffic Officers assigned to
respo
nd or even prevent crashes.
Mental health calls continue to spiral upward. In 2020, the Department
responded to
1,739
mental health related calls, while completing 466 emergency
committals.
This compares to 784 calls in 2015, which is a 122% increase!
Gun discharges and/or deadly conduct rose by 16% from 277 in 2015 to 322 in
2020.
Immediate Staffing Concerns:
According to the US Census Bureau, the population of San Marcos grew 43.5%
from April 2010 to July 2019. The Department has not grown commens
urately.
C
ity Council has not authorized any increases in sworn staffing since 2018. No
sworn supervisors have been added since 2016, when (1) sergeant was added.
T
he department actually lost (1)
Commander
position and has operated with only
(4) comman
ders since 2002. Currently one commander supervises all Eves and
Midnights, seven days a week
which is un
sustainable
given the increase in crime
CoSM is experiencing
.
The
Patrol Division
has a daily staffing of only (6) officers
on the
streets for
the
e
ntire City of San Marcos.
They are staffed with (8) officers, but (1) is allowed to
3
take vacation, and (1) is allowed to attend training.
Dayshift minimum staffing
on the streets
is (6), as
are Evenings
and Midnights. The only overlap is between
the hou
rs of 8p and 3a.
Until
2021
, the Criminal Investigations Division has not added a detective in 10
years. Due to the types of offenses the City is experiencing (which are above the
national average), the inherent complications that come with violent crimes and
the ever
-
present need to collect more and more evidence including technological
evidence, the demand on CID is unmanageable for the number of detectives
currently employed. C
ases are inactivated daily because staffing does not allow
for their investigation.
No full
-
time 9
-
1
-
1 operator has been added since 2013, yet calls and
expectations continue to increase. Our 9
-
1
-
1 Communications Division is the
only division in the cou
nty to use Emergency Medical Dispatch, Emergency Fire
Dispatch,
and
Emergency Police Dispatch
.
Additionally, the Division handles all
Fire and EMS calls for the University, while also handling a portion of EMS calls
for Guadalupe County.
The division is
currently short (11) employees, or 41% of
their entire workforce. They are not the highest paid telecommunicators in the
Government Building, and they have no certificate pay or shift differential pay.
With certificate pay and base pay
combined, t
he City
of Kyle
and
Hays
County
pay more for these positions.
“Great vision without great people is irrelevant.”
Jim Collins, Good to Great
Page 1 / 3
Zoom 100%

Related Articles

One Comment

  1. Jude Prather knows the meaning of “public safety”. As a member of the Texas state guard, he took an eleven month tour of Afghanistan, in order to make that nation safe for the LGBTQ flag waiving outside of our American embassy there.

    “The situation with public safety is very concerning,” said Prather. “. . . we’ve had five officers killed or wounded in the past three years.” Strange Mr. Prather does not explain how three of those police officers were killed or wounded by an illegal foreign national under the protection of Mano Amiga.

    Mr. Prather does not reckon Mano Amiga a public safety issue but merely a political ally.

    Mr. Prather’s yearly salary has been $62,472.72 (not including health insurance and paid vacations) for the last 11 years as the director of Hays county veteran services, where in his own words, he is “Fulfilling the sacred promise made to our Veterans.” For the last 16 months his office has been uninhabited and locked with a sacred sign on the door, that advises all how “public safety is very concerning, so call and we can arrange something if you’re a veteran.”

    Prior that, Mr. Prather served on city council as the advocate for the “progressive” development of our community on behalf of out of state investors, because ‘the situation and need for community investment is very concerning.’ As a community, let’s be thankful that for only $146,390 a year (not including benefits and paid vactions) that his wife Ms. Kathy Martinez-Prather humbly serves as the Director of the Public Safety School at Texas State University, where according to her mission statement:
    “The Texas School Safety Center serves schools and communities to create safe, secure, and healthy environments. The Texas School Safety Center envisions a world where all schools and communities are safe, secure, and healthy. We work continuously and diligently to keep our schools safe, secure, and healthy .”

    In this way Mr. Prather retains his sacred promise made to the safety of all investors and to Texas State University on behalf of teaching our community (and your children) how to safely think and how to identify the improper thoughts and potential threats posed by others, who–unlike Mr. Prather– do not understand that here, in our community, “the situation with public safety is very concerning.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button